Can anybody assist with a query I have, relating to Section 211 IHT 1984, whereby the surviving joint tenant of real property has been assessed to IHT, that assessment being a proportion of the IHT payable by the estate, in that part of the estate’s nil rate band has been apportioned to the surviving joint tenant’s property. The surviving joint tenant is not a beneficiary of the estate and it seems inequitable that the joint tenant should benefit from the estate’s nil rate band. Is the amount of the benefit of the estate’s nil rate band that has been apportioned to this joint tenant something that has been paid or expended by the estate and therefore recoverable under section 211 (3) IHT 1984.
Lizzie Mullaney
Gaby Hardwicke