Deceased (A) inherited 50% in a rental property from late spouse, with the other 50% going to son (B) - owned as Joint Tenants. The property rental continued and the rental income was shared 50/50. A becomes sick and B and his wife decide to move into the rental property (close to the family home) to provide care. No rent is paid by B to A. The property needs refurbishment and A pays 90% of the costs. A then dies.
The family executors would like to persuade HMRC that the disparity of contributions should be ignored as if B had not moved, A would have gone to a home and paid substantial fees. I don’t see HMRC accepting such a netting off.
Assuming this is not going to work, should the excess contribution by A to the refurbishment be treated as a gift to B as co-owner or do the rules of Equitable Accounting (see Re Pavlou) apply, meaning that there is a debt owed by B to A at death of the lower of the overpaid refurbishment costs or the proportionate increase in value in the joint property due to the refurbishment?
Thanks.