Nil Rate Band Discretionary Trust not set up on first death and CGT liability

I am dealing with the administration of an estate where a Nil Rate Band Discretionary Trust was included in the Will of the Husband and where I think I may now have a CGT liability. The problem is as follows:

Husband died on 2010. In his Will, he left a Nil Rate Band Discretionary Trust and then the residue of his estate to Wife. The executors appointed in his Will were the Wife and X and Y.

The Wife took out a Grant of Probate in her sole name with power reserved to the other executors. She appears to have been under the mistaken belief that the whole of her Husband’s estate passed to her. She therefore took no steps to set up the Nil Rate Band Discretionary Trust and nor did the trustees take steps to appoint the trust fund out in her favour or to agree a loan in her favour.

The Husband and Wife held the family home as tenants in common. The Wife took no steps to deal with her Husband’s half share of the property and it remained in joint names until it was sold in March 2022 when the Wife went into care. The net proceeds of sale were £696,251. The house was worth £450K in 2010.

Apart from the house, other assets in the Husband’s estate where £1116 but the funeral expenses were £4010.

As no steps were taken to deal with the Husband’s share in the property, it would appear (STEP forum) that his half share still formed part of his estate. There was a gain arising on the sale of the property and therefore a potential Capital Gains Tax liability in the Husband’s estate.

I am wondering whether there is any way of avoiding the Capital Gains Tax liability. If the trustees were allowing the Wife to occupy the property under the terms of the trust, then Principal Private Residence would apply. However, I am not aware that the trustees took any steps to allow her to live there.

Had the Wife transferred the property to herself, albeit in the mistaken belief that she was solely entitled to the property, possibly Principal Private Residence exemption would apply. However, it appears she took no steps to transfer her Husband’s share of the property to herself. A second trustee was appointed on the sale of the property to enable the sale to proceed. All of the proceeds of sale were paid to the Wife. She had dementia when the property was sold.

Apart from the property, the other assets in the Husband’s estate appear to have been £1,116, less testamentary expenses of £4,010. There were bank accounts but these passed automatically by survivorship to the Wife.

My first question: is there any way to avoid the CGT liability on the Husband’s estate?

Second question: I assume that the Nil Rate Sum is now deducted form the Wife’s estate and paid to the Husband’s estate and then into the trust. The Nil Rate Band in 2010 was £325K. Do I deduct £325K from the Wife’s estate or do I deduct half the net proceeds of sale of the property, then deduct the CGT liability on the Husband’s estate which is then likely to leave the Husband’s estate less than £325K so that the whole of his estate is used to fund the Nil Rate Sum? The Discretionary Trust is likely to be wound up in favour of the same beneficiaries as the Wife’s estate so I am not intending to add any interest to the amount which should have gone into the trust.

Third question: Is there anything else I should be considering?

I would appreciate any advice anyone can offer.

Brenda Smyth

Solicitor

AMD Solicitors

100 Henleaze Road

Henleaze

Bristol, BS9 4JZ

E: brendasmyth@amdsolicitors.com

W: www.amdsolicitors.com

image001.jpg

image002.jpg

image003.png

image004.jpg

Whilst the wife took out probate, it appears she did not do anything about the property, so that it remains within the husband’s estate.

In respect of the first question, I do not believe there is anything that can be done to avoid CGT, which would be assessable on the personal representative of the husband’s estate, so no annual CGT exemption available. As the widow has died, the possibility of relief under s.225A has died with her.

With regard to the second question, the trustees are entitled to the £325,000 plus interest at the appropriate rate from the first anniversary of death. Whilst for the purpose of identifying if there is any transferable nil rate band available, the net value of the estate as at the date of death s relevant, when identifying the trustees’ entitlement it is necessary to look at the value of the estate as at the date the legacy is to be satisfied (applying Re Charteris, 1917). As the property hs sold for in excess of £650,000, the capital value of the legacy will be the full £325,000 for the purposes of appropriation.

It is open for the trustees to exercise their discretion to wind up the trust before the legacy is satisfied. It would then be for the beneficiaries then entitled to decide whether or not they might wish to waive any interest due for late payment of the trust capital. This would avoid the trustees needing to get into a detailed analysis of whether it would be in the interests of he trust to waive the right to interest.

Paul Saunders FCIB TEP

Independent Trust Consultant

Providing support and advice to fellow professionals

~WRD000.jpg

image004.jpg

image005.jpg

image006.jpg

Many thank Paul for the advice.