S15 willls act - charity employee as witness

Would a Charitable gift be void if one of the witnesses was employed by the charity at the date the will was signed?

My assumption is the definition of person would not include an employee of a beneficiary as they are not directly benefiting from the Will.

R Stafford

I am not aware of any bar on the employee of a charity witnessing a will which benefits the charity.And which would prevent the charity from receiving its inheritance.

Patrick Moroney

Thank you, Patrick, for reaffirming my opinion

Mrs Rachel Stafford

Solicitor

Rachel Stafford Legal Services
Wills, trusts and private client advice specialist

22 Whittle Road
Thame
OX9 3PF

Tel. 01844 218530
Mob. 0797 406 9637

You should carry out your own virus check before opening any attachment. Rachel Stafford Legal Services accepts no liability for any loss or damage which may be caused by software viruses or interception or interruption of this email.

The contents of this email and any attachments are intended for the confidential use of the named recipient(s) only. They may be legally privileged and should not be communicated to or relied upon by any person without our express written consent. If you are not the intended recipient please accept our apologies. Please inform that this message has gone astray before deleting it. Thank you for your co-operation.

Mrs. Rachel Stafford is a sole practitioner. Rachel Stafford Legal Services registered in England and Wales with the Law Society.

Rachel Stafford Legal Services is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under reference number 523018 and is subject to the Solicitors Code of Conduct 2011, which can be viewed at http://www.sra.org.uk/solicitors/handbook/code/content.page

Please consider whether you really need to print this e-mail.

WA 1837 s15 only applies to beneficial gifts which is not the case here. Gifts to X as a trustee would thus not be invalidated.

See Re Ray’s WT [1936] not exactly the same as your case but not that different; and Cresswell v Cresswell [1838]

Malcolm Finney