Termination of life interest in favour of son

A wife’s will gives the husband a life interest with overriding powers and then a discretionary trust Her estate includes a half share of the residential home held by them as tenants in common Because of the prior life interest s144 IHTA does not therefore apply

There is prior legacy trust with power to appoint the residential NRB interest to the son which would first be done to take up the relief, but the remaining half share of the matrimonial home would otherwise form part of the life interest which, under the Will started from date of death. Father would however be happy effectively to for that remaining half share to go to the son, as he can reside at the property under his half share To do so, it is proposed that the executors first appoint the son as the sole beneficiary absolutely, subject to the life interest and then that the trustees exercise their overriding power to terminate the life interest and appoint the remaining half share to the son absolutely In my view, that this then would be treated as PET by father but that it would not be treated as a GROB by him, as the son inherits under mother’s will, albeit that the transaction results in a PET by the Father That would then start the 7year period running. Any comments?

Michael Jepson

M J Consultants

1 Like

Without knowing the full details, I would on the face of it, be reluctant to appoint the son as beneficiary of the half share whilst the father is alive. If the son divorced or was made bankrupt, the father’s security in his home would be jeopardised.

Carol Gregorious
Hyland Fitzwater Solicitors

If the intention is that the half share falls (somehow or other) into an IPDI for the husband and that that IPDI is terminated in favour of the son absolutely, then it seems to be a deemed PET by the father to the son. However, there could be a reservation of benefit by virtue of s102ZA Finance Act 1986 (unless any of the usual GROB exemptions apply).

Paul Davidoff
New Quadrant Partners Ltd